Bug#405467: linux-image-2.6.18-3-amd64: uses 100% CPU time handling hardware interrupts from parallel port
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:15:29PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> maximilian attems <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > this is pretty useless in this case,
> > if you want to do something usefull grab 2.6.20-rc3 from upstream
> > and file bugzilla.kernel.org bugs for the open ones.
> > afaik acpi is still not settled, may be othere ones too.
> I am not a Linux kernel developer; I am a Debian developer. The
> purpose of this bug report is to document an issue (and its
> workaround) in Debian Etch. Even if the bug is fixed upstream, it is
> still present in Debian Etch at this time, and will affect other
> people for as long as the buggy kernel is in Debian Etch.
> > linux-2.6 meta packet has way to many bogus or valid reports that a
> > user would look at it, so i highly question this documentation.
> As can be seen from the subject line, I did not file this bug report
> against linux-2.6; I filed it against linux-image-2.6.18-3-amd64.
> There are, currently, 6 bugs on that package, none of which seem bogus
> to me.
haha, and how long do you thing will linux-image-2.6.18-3-amd64 live?
there is already an linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 in svn and
it will get uploaded soon. consequence your bugs gets reassigned to
anyway i'll stop from posting to that bug report as the attitude
that a bugreport is per principle valuable documentation and the
attached love to that little value is not worth the time spend.