Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
> > > > >what about that?
> > > > >
> > > > >debian-devel-kernel@
> > > > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> > > > it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
> > > > debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are
> > > > drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new
> > > > list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-).
> > >
> > > I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the
> > > mbox names nicely together. :-)
> > :-)
> > debian-kernel-maint?
> debian-kernel-bugs ?
> If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is
> by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be
The point is to *keep* d-k the bug report list instead of trying to
re-route the bug reports for all kernels released ever.