Re: New kernel-package 10.009 heading for experimental
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:58:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:43:07 +0100, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> said:
>>
>> > As discussed on irc, we still need to find out why the new k-p break
>> > (or whatever you want to call it) the linux-2.6 control file
>> > mechanism, and thus we end up with missing dependencies on the
>> > linux-image packages, which break the ramdisk-tool upgrade path.
>>
>> > Please don't upload the package to unstable until we know what is
>> > going on, and fix it, but i guess that was always your intentions.
>>
>> Well, as it turns out, it was not kernel-package breaking the
>> dependency mechanism, it was the linux-2.6 control file not playing
>> nice with dpkg-gencontrol, so the only thing holding kernel-package
>> back is a request from the kernel team to wait until the -3 release.
>
> Indeed, and all the issues i was aware of have been solved now, so as far as i
> am concerned the 10.00x k-p can go in unstable, not sure if we should use it
> for -3 directly or not.
>
> Sorry for the confusion about this, i seriously believed you where uploading
> to unstable.
I've been away from my desk for a few days, well other than
occasionaly popping in on IRC. If I'm not deeply mistaken 2.6.14-3
is now out there, and was released using k-p 9.008.4. 10.00x seems
to be in pretty good shape now, unless something nasty is
lurking deeper in my INBOX. Manoj, please upload at will.
--
Horms
Reply to: