Re: Bug#331391: Re: ftpmaster: Please remove 2.6.8 kernel images
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Also, if the user don't upgrade those, nothing major will break, apart from
> > > > the fact that he has a few unused bits on his harddisk.
> > > >
> > > > So, i vote for simply removing them, and provide some notice of the fact and
> > > > the new module build model in the release notes or something.
> > >
> > > Its an upgrade problem, but it doesn't affect that many users
> > > (I guess). I'm happy with your idea as long as you've considered
> > > the upgrade problem.
> >
> > Iti s an sarge -> etch upgrade problem if anything, let's remove them for now,
> > and once we sorted out the module build issues, we can always readd them fori
> > etch if really needed.
>
> What other type of upgrade issue is there?
etch->sid, etch->etch, sid->sid, random experimental snapshot or
self-built->etch/sid :)
> If its going to be a problem for etch we may as well cope with
> it sooner or latter, it really seems to be a no brainer of
> handling kernel-headers-2.6-<flavour> the wway we alreaday handle
> kernel-image-2.6-<flavour>
I would rather we drop it though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: