Re: Kde 3.5 ...
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:26:34PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> On Thursday 06 May 2010 it was so written:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 07:41:23AM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ana Guerrero was heard to say:
> > > > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote:
> > > > > Maybe use dummy packages, or rename the packages so that KDE
> > > > > 3.5 could remain installed, and not be forced to upgrade to
> > > > > Kde4.
> > > >
> > > > No, there is not sane way and there is nobody interested on it.
> > >
> > > While the former is certainly true, the latter is demonstrably
> > > false.
> >
> > False?
>
> Yes, false. There are lots of people who are interested in having KDE3
> continue, as opposed to being "forced to upgrade" to KDE4.
>
Ok, you read me wrong: nobody is interested in working on it.
> > Who from the current maintainers have seen you showing
> > interest in maintaining KDE 3.5? Please demostrate it :-)
>
> I'll demonstrate, sure.
>
> "there is nobody interested on it" does not equal "there is no
> developers interested in working on it".
>
> If you had stated "from the current maintainers" in the first place, I
> would not have taken your statement as inclusive of all people, and
> you would not have then assumed that I mean developers.
>
> That there are no interested developers to do the work involved is
> self evident, since it is not occurring.
And since we said from the very beginning (more than 2 years) it was not going
to happen.
You have demostrated nothing here =)
Ana
Reply to: