[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KMail - 4.2.4 outdated documentation...?



Hello,

On 2009 m. June 18 d., Thursday 16:00:34 Peder Chr. Nørgaard wrote:
> 	Can someone, preferrably one of the packagers, talk about the state of the
> documentation of KMail?  I mean, it is really miserable.  If someone at
> the KDE upstream is known to be working on it, I'll just wait patiently. 
> But if not, I offer my assistance in updating it.  I am not without
> experience in reading code and translating it into user documentation.

Packagers do not write software (nor upstream docs for that matter). 
Documentation is typically neglected in the FOSS world because it is boring to 
write and the application is perfectly usable without it (and KMail is pretty 
intuitive). If you want to improve current situation, get in touch with 
upstream kmail developers.

-- 
Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: