Re: could not find vim component configuration menu
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:24:24 -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> On Friday 02 June 2006 01:50, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 21:48:05 -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > > I could not find the "vim component configuration" menu in kcontrol as
> > > explained in
> > >
> > > http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdebase/userguide/kcontrol-kde-compone
> > >nts.html
> > >
> > > Is this document out of date? or kcontrol in Sid is inconsistent with the
> > > documentation?
> >
> > I have this menu in kcontrol 3.5.3-1; it is called "Vim Embedding" and
> > does what is described in the above link.
> > Maybe you are missing a package?
> >
> > $ dpkg -l \*vim\* | grep ^ii
> > ii vim 7.0-017+4 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
> > ii vim-common 7.0-017+4 Vi IMproved - Common files
> > ii vim-doc 7.0-017+4 Vi IMproved - HTML documentation
> > ii vim-gtk 7.0-017+4 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with
> > GTK2 ii vim-gui-common 7.0-017+4 Vi IMproved - Common GUI files
> > ii vim-runtime 7.0-017+4 Vi IMproved - Runtime files
> > ii vimpart 3.4.3-1 embedded Vim text editor component for
> > KDE
> >
>
> I am unable to install vimpart package. Other than that I have all the
> packages that you have installed. Could that be the problem?
It seems that vimpart is only in stable, but not in testing or unstable:
$ apt-cache policy vimpart
vimpart:
Installed: 4:3.4.3-1
Candidate: 4:3.4.3-1
Version table:
*** 4:3.4.3-1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
4:3.3.2-4 0
500 http://ftp.nl.debian.org stable/main Packages
Truth be told, I don't recall how it ended up being installed on my
system, but it looks like it used to be a dependency of kde-addons in
KDE 3.3. The package description sounds like it is indeed responsible
for making the embedding work:
Description: embedded Vim text editor component for KDE
This package allows the text editor Vim to be embedded into a number of
different KDE applications. It does this by encapsulating Vim within a
KPart (an embedded KDE component).
--
Regards,
Florian
Reply to: