Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:29:26 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040730112926.A25128@digican.ms.unimelb.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] cec3id$qmv$1@online.de>; from bernd-schubert@web.de on Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 02:08:45AM +0200
References: <[🔎] ce8la6$url$1@online.de> <[🔎] 200407281816.30798.dpjames@rogers.com> <[🔎] 20040729223230.GG651@cheney.cx> <[🔎] cec3id$qmv$1@online.de>

Hi.

> I really belief that it would be better to include a bug fixed kde 3.2 than
> a buggy kde 3.3.

FWIW, I'm also in favour of including 3.2.3 rather than 3.3.0.  Each new
3.x release seems to (understandably) begin with a number of annoyances
that are ironed out over the BRANCH releases, and debian is certainly
known for shipping old and solid over new and flaky.

b.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
  - From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx>

References:
- 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
  - From: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de>
- Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
  - From: David P James <dpjames@rogers.com>
- Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
  - From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx>
- Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
  - From: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de>

Prev by Date: Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
Next by Date: Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
Previous by thread: Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
Next by thread: Re: 3.2.3-3 in sarge?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread