jedd <jedd@progsoc.org> writes: > On Wed June 16 2004 10:52 pm, Alexander Nordström wrote: > ] Please don't change the Reply-To header to exclude the list. You > ] may add yourself to it if you want CCs (and I have assumed that > ] this is the case), but make sure the list gets included too. > > Sorry. Had it set that way for ages. I've fixed it now, I think. I > guess because I always use reply-all on lists, rather than just > reply, I've never noticed the problem against other users .. hence > never checked it for my own account. You shouldn't be using Reply-to-all, but rather Reply-to-List. If your MUA doesn't have such basic functionality, file a bug report (or better yet, fix it and submit a patch). > Doing a reply-all here of course would result in a bounce when > delivering to the NOSPAM address. Is this more convenient? Who can > say. Email address munging is considered harmful. http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/ -- Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca> Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
Attachment:
pgpf85GVEh4EH.pgp
Description: PGP signature