On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 03:39:09AM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote: > Henning Moll writes: > > > On Sunday 25 April 2004 17:35, Dominique Devriese wrote: > >> Henning Moll writes: > >> > Hi! Will this package be also renamed in the 'final release' of > >> > KDE322 for Woody? > >> > >> Yes. > > > AFAIK, 'c102' stands for the transition from one gcc-version to > > another incompatible gcc-version, which is done in sid. Why should > > this affect woody? > > Oh, I see, I thought you were talking about unstable. /me should > learn to read posts better... > > About the c102 thing: KDE 3.2 depends on Qt >= 3.2.3, and I assume > that the KDE packagers for woody have just ported the qt-x11-free > packages from unstable to woody, instead of trying to adapt the woody > packages to a newer Qt. I personally would probably have done the > same. They should only have the c102 name if the packages are compiled with gcc 3.2 or newer. > >> > I am providing a package of k3b for woody. This package won't > >> > install with the current debs of KDE322. Sure, it's easy to > >> > correct this, but then, the package will fail on systems with > >> > older versions of KDE3. > > Can't you make your package depend on kdelibs4, and use the implicit > kdelibs4->libqt3* dependency ? No. The package dependencies are generated at build time against whatever the package links to, plus manually set dependencies. So for kdelibs4 and libqt3c102-mt they are automatically set up. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature