Re: 3.1.5 still to come?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I posted that one or two weeks ago , I have done woody debs of 3.1.5 :
ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/debian/kde-woody/
until Ralf provide its own, you can use these ones.
Cheers,
Mik
Le Monday 09 February 2004 23:56, Nick Boyce a écrit :
> On Monday 09 Feb 2004 10:16 am, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:00:55AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > > On Monday 09 February 2004 02.22, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 08 Feb 2004 11:49 pm, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> > > > > Is 3.1.5 still to come or are we supposed to go directly to
> > > > > 3.2?
>
> [...]
>
> > > > I'd be quite interested in that answer.
>
> [...]
>
> > > A quick 'apt-cache policy <some kde package>' shows that 3.1.5
> > > packages are in> unstable.
> >
> > They seem to be referring to the woody backport debs at kde.org. As
> > to the answer I don't know what Ralf is planning...
>
> Yep, it's Woody debs we're after. In case anyone wants to suggest we
> just go for 3.2 instead, _my_ stance on this is simply that 3.1.4 is
> rock-solid on my machines, and only lacks the VCF security fix :
> http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20040114-1.txt
> whereas people are currently reporting a number of more or less painful
> issues with 3.2 on Woody (Kmail 1.6 bugs, packaging faults, cosmetic
> issues, "could not start kdeinit", etc.).
>
> I'd like to join the collective shakedown effort (and play with all the
> new geegaws), but just don't have the time right now - I must contain
> myself and wait a while.
>
> If all this is now solved, could some kind person post a Woody-KDE
> state-of-the-nation please ?
>
> Thanks
> Nick Boyce
> Bristol, UK
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAKBDxyOYzc4nQ8j0RAjRPAKCeOkV0KV5s39cpkPO6/KkNntkvxwCfeS2N
Sg/DCFmyAnlpvBNHlw+uFMQ=
=eNDa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: