[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why Are Some Fonts So Bad ?



* Nick Boyce [Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:32:19 +0000]:
> I'm running KDE 3.1.4 with XFree86 4.1.0-16 on Woody, with anti-aliasing 
                                              ^^^^^^^^
> switched on

QT backport to woody is compiled without anti-aliasing (XFT support).

* Nick Boyce [Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:06:13 +0000]:
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:03:33 +0100, Gunter Ohrner wrote:

> >By the way, *none* of the fonts in the screenshot is anti-aliased.

> Oh ... thanks .. really ? ... confused I am now.

> Anti-aliasing is definitely enabled in Kcontrol - see my screenshot of
> the relevant part of the Kcontrol dialog :
>   http://www.glimmer.demon.co.uk/kde/ctlcent-font-spec.png

> Maybe it's lying to me  :-(

Well, you *have* the checkbox enabled, but antialiasing can never get to
work because it's simply not available in your version of QT. IMO it all
would be a little less confusing if KControl detected this and wouldn't
let you choose anti-aliasing if it's not compiled in.


* Nick Boyce [Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:06:15 +0000]:

> One weird thing is that if I start a Konsole "Linux console" session,
> then I always get this error :
>   Font '-misc-console-medium-r-normal--16-160-72-72-c-160-iso10646-1'
>   not found.

> I don't have the xfonts-konsole package installed, so maybe that's the
> cause of this error.

Definitely. That font belongs to that package.

* Nick Boyce [Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:06:14 +0000]:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:57:28 -0600, Bart Dorsey wrote:

> >Also make sure you have fontconfig installed, 

> I don't have a fontconfig command ... isn't that a Sid feature ? (I'm
> running Woody).  FWIW, I don't have an fc-cache command either.

It's on sid, correct.

> > .. and finally , make sure you have 
> >anti aliasing turned on in the Kcontrol fonts dialog box.

> Yep - I *do* have that switched on - see my screenshot of the relevant
> part of the Kcontrol dialog, here :
>   http://www.glimmer.demon.co.uk/kde/ctlcent-font-spec.png
> but as I commented earlier in this thread, maybe it's lying to me ...

Explained.


> >BTW, apt-get install ttf-bitstream-vera 

> >the font I'm using there is Bitstream Vera Sans.

> Ok, thanks - I might try that - which font(s) do you have set to that
> choice in the Kcontrol dialog ?

> I confess - Linux font technology is dark magic as far as I'm
> concerned - I haven't had the time to take the relevant degree in
> Linux Font Physics ;-), and I wouldn't know a bitstream font from a
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> bitmap font.  I'm ok with monospaced vs proportional, and that's about
  ^^^^^^^^^^^
> it ...

Don't get that confused here: Bitstream seems to be the Foundry of the
font, not a type or anything else. type(Bitstream) == type(Adobe) !=
type(bitmap).


-- 
Adeodato Simó (a.k.a. thibaut)
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | IM: my_dato [jabber.org] | PK: DA6AE621
 
Proper treatment will cure a cold in seven days, but left to itself, a
cold will hang on for a week.
                -- Darrell Huff

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: