Re: GCC 3.2 now becoming default compiler for Sid!!!
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 06:14:47AM +0800, csj@mindgate.net wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:01:50 -0700,
> Ivan E. Moore II <rkrusty@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:39:30AM +0100, Mario J. Barch?in Molina wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > El Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:43, Daniel Stone escribi?:
> > >
> > > > * Qt3 to be uploaded, built with g++3.2.
> > >
> > > I am building my own QT3 debs with g++3.2. Should I stop compiling and
> > > wait a few hours/days?
> >
> > yes...otherwise they will break when the new X packages are available.
>
> [...]
>
> That's strange. I *have* KDE built with the following inserted
> into the debian/rules of all KDE packages that seem to want it:
>
> # GCC 3.2 defines
> export CC = gcc-3.2
> export CXX = g++-3.2
> export CPP = cpp-3.2
>
> XFree86 was compiled (a month ago) without any fussing about
> which compiler, etc., I used (e.g. a sraight "debuild -b -uc
> -us").
>
that's correct. gcc 3.2 is binary compatible to gcc 2.95. only g++ is
not. as the xfree libs are all plain c ... :-)
greetings
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
Reply to: