[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Building kdelibs (unstable) from source package?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Montag, 23. Dezember 2002 23:24, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> On Monday 23 December 2002 14:20, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > On Montag, 23. Dezember 2002 14:14, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> > > I'm trying to build the kdelibs (3.0.4; unstable) from the source
> > > package, but for some reason that I don't understand it fails.
> >
> > Use automake 1.5, autoconf 2.53, uninstall libtool.
>
> Sigh. Is there any way to understand this stuff? I have no idea how I
> would have had to go about to find this out for myself. Some time ago
> I've even (partially) read the Autoconf book, but it doesn't help in
> cases such as this.
>
> > And build 3.0.5a which includes the security patches :-)
>
> Do the (binary) packages work on unstable, too? I don't yet get that
> much fun out of building the packages. In fact, for 3.0.x I'm only
> doing it because I want to track down why Bookcase instantly crashes on
> my system. For this, I need some way to debug into kdelibs and qt and I
> only want to build them myself.
I'd give it a try, but debugging *into* kdelibs and qt requires a kdelibs and 
qt with debugging enabled. Which you haven't unless you build them yourself 
:-)

I'd try debugging the program first.

Ralf

>
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Schuerig                  If at first you don't succeed...
> mailto:schuerig@acm.org           try, try again.
> http://www.schuerig.de/michael/   --Jerome Morrow, "Gattaca"

- -- 
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralf Nolden
nolden@kde.org

The K Desktop Environment       The KDevelop Project
http://www.kde.org              http://www.kdevelop.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+B5QTu0nKi+w1Ky8RAuQVAJsHuk3Rs08AjK4/qPbmpfXq+5uWdACgqbze
RbuTyj20NDu0Pz1DqR9Ju4A=
=qnF4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: