Re: 178 days and counting
Hendrik Sattler <ubq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> writes:
> Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:36 schrieb
> Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com:
>
>> woody/unstable (libc3.x maybe? I don't remember.) that were dependencies.
>
> Because you wrote that often enought now:
> "woody" is not "unstable" or "testing" but the current "stable", maybe you
> should take a look at http://www.debian.org to get this right:
> "woody" == current "stable"
> "sarge" == current "testing"
> "sid" == always "unstable"
> It is annoying and hard to track what you mean when you mix this up
> completely.
Sorry. I've been a long-time Redhat user, just recently transitioning to
Debian so I'm still learning the lingo. I'll try to be more careful with my
terminology in the future. Thanks for the lesson.
Derrell
Reply to: