Re: 178 days and counting
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:36 schrieb
Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com:
> woody/unstable (libc3.x maybe? I don't remember.) that were dependencies.
Because you wrote that often enought now:
"woody" is not "unstable" or "testing" but the current "stable", maybe you
should take a look at http://www.debian.org to get this right:
"woody" == current "stable"
"sarge" == current "testing"
"sid" == always "unstable"
It is annoying and hard to track what you mean when you mix this up
completely.
BTW: I don't understand why most unstable packages are not in unstable
anymore. KDE3.x ist left out because of gcc3.2, although it does not make
much sense: if it breaks on transistion to gcc3.2- well, it's unstable. Same
with XFree4.2. What's the difference to make the gcc change with or without
KDE3 in unstable? It compiles with gcc2.95 and troubles with gcc3.2 are
expected anyway.
Sorry, but it does not make much sense to me at all. This is no matter to me
though because I track testing and not unstable. But current behaviour makes
unstable rather pointless.
HS
- --
Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de
oder über pgp.net
PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9lJzpzvr6q9zCwcERAhSDAJ9CCSVndeCaWflQRp0Y/FLwC1FJxACgjVxv
nbp0lnoIHEe4fbM5cNWLONg=
=9Zz/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: