Re: Which QT?
> I've been toying with the 'best' method of compiling KDE3 on woody lately,
> and in the interests of lazyness I'm wondering whether it's a good idea to
> use woodys qt3 packages.
It's quite easy to compile on woody.
> Everything (almost) has compiled fine using those, seems very stable. If I
> were to have compiled qt3 myself though, could I expect any noticable leaps
> in performance? Any qt specific optimizations I could/should use?
I don't know.
> There was one niggle taking this shortcut, kdegraphics won't compile. It
> requires imlib, imlib requires an older version libpng whose -dev package
> conflicts with the libpng-dev package that qt3 wants, in short imlib and qt3
> dev files won't coexist, I can't compile kdegraphics. Should I just forget
> about this and start over with a custom built qt3 perhaps like I should have
> done the first time around?
Yes.
Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Which QT?
- From: "Dan Slatford" <dan@foxpaw.fsnet.co.uk>