Re: KDE 3.0rc3 Debs???
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I'm not sure that in general there are really enough improvements to
> actually be worthy of a change in major release number (from 2.x to 3.x)
> because it feels more like a 2.3 release than a 3.0. The KDE 2.2 debs
> (Woody anyway) were just as fast in my experience. Unless there is anything
> you desperately need in KDE 3, I wouldn't rush madly to upgrade until the
> debs are made.
Well, the reason they went to 3.0 is because of the binary-incompatability
changes. The whole point of 3 what to switch to qt3 and cleanup any cruft
left-over from their first attempts at the dcop/kpart solution. So, there
wasn't supposed to be *major* changes, just ones that can't be made between,
say, 2.1.1 and 2.2.
As for the speed difference, are you using self-compiled bins, or pre-release
.debs? I ask, because (supposedly) compiling things yourself causes a
speedup, and that's what I did :-)
- --
D.A.Bishop
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8qxcwEHLN/FXAbC0RArOmAJ42rdZL8VWRFYfNKy1AaFhs7MveyACdH3ur
2C80RGgeLqw6yLxd8GOTR0c=
=Wwc1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: