On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:15:00AM +0000, Nick wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:42:55 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > > >> On Monday 07 January 2002 07:22, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > >> > Hopefully unstable kde will be working good within 10 days (time for > >> > buildds to catch up) > > > >After talking to one of the buildd guys I think the estimate will probably > >be bumped out to about 14 days, due to the time to build some of the key > >packages. > > Can Chris or anyone else who Understands please give a corresponding > comment about testing ? I believe the standard wisdom is that > testing KDE has been less useful than unstable KDE (though I don't > understand why), and I'm just wondering whether that will now change. I suggest using the packages from unstable. Migration to testing isn't automatic, and KDE packages are being held back due to problems with libstdc++3 and such on hppa and arm. Thus the packages are older, such as kdenetwork, which is still lacking IMAP support in woody ... > I realise the packages take longer to get to testing .. If they get there at all. :) d -- Daniel Stone <daniel@sfarc.net> * razathorn hath returned from the great (void *)
Attachment:
pgpuCG4V7RqVZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature