Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:36:40PM +0200, Philipp Siegert wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 22:59 schrieben Sie:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:24:37PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote:
> > > > I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The
> > > > kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is
> > > > located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested
> > > > machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the
> > > > configure script.
> > > > I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I
> > > > can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I
> > > > can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you
> > > > send me a location where to download older binutil packages ?
> > >
> > > I'll put them up somewhere. Objprelink shouldn't be used, IIRC. I'm
> > > working on getting the necessary changes done for using Jakub Jelinek's
> > > prelink work, though.
> >
> > and packages built with the current binutils/glibc without objprelink run
> > faster that those built with objprelink. objprelink's use is outdated
> > really.
> >
> > Ivan
>
> Ivan, are your latest packages built with these binutils/glibc or do I have
> to compile them myself ?
> Chris, I think we'll skip the test with older binutils then. You don't have
> to make them available.
yes. they are built using the latest in fact I'm about to upload another
set that will be built with the binutils that was uploaded a few days ago.
Ivan
--
----------------
Ivan E. Moore II
rkrusty@tdyc.com
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Reply to: