Re: KMail and Debian packages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 18:04, Michael Häckel wrote:
> If it is really not possible to change that, wouldn't it then be
> better to leave the whole KDE release in unstable until all
> packages are ready for testing?
Wouldn't making all KDE packages depend on kdelibs=2.2.1 and
kdebase=2.2.1 be enough? New packages would be held back then until
these other packages went through.
Actually, right now the problem is that KMail hasn't gotten through
to testing yet but if the current KMail package depended on
kdelibs=2.1.2 and kdebase=2.1.2 then these upgrades would be held
back, too, right?
- --
- -M
- ------- Magnus von Koeller <magnus@vonkoeller.de> ------
Georg-Westermann-Allee 76 / 38104 Braunschweig / Germany
Phone: +49-(0)531/2094886 Mobile: +49-(0)179/4562940
lp1 on fire (One of the more obfuscated kernel messages)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7+/RsUIvM6e6BgFARAmEYAKDecUTTmfEZZGKN8nOU8+lLkXid1ACg5hk3
BBno7Y33j/JE3VkeP2rZ/VY=
=MGBX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: