Re: This made my day ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 16 November 2001 09:14, you wrote:
> Ouch. C++? Best programming language?? Well, it's one up on assembler I
> suppose.
Assembler's great! I love coding with it, it's like a thrilling
game and a real challange - and that's what makes and keeps coding
interesting! I also tried OOP with Borland Turbo-Assembler (I started
programming with DOS...). But you're true, it is not powerfull (this means in
a way usefull!!!!) enough to handle big projects! In this case a good
object-orientated, abstract implementation (and that's what KDE is!) is in my
opinion the only usefull way to go. --> C++ as a good way between system and
high level (and KDE/QT IS high-level and abstract!)
> Actually, java's much nicer: it's just swing, AWT and the Sun run-time
> which suck. I like gcj a lot.
Never tried gcj, but i will if you say so! But I think that programming with
java hides so many interesting and sometimes iportant system-level things
from the programmer, that it is nice to start with and learn OOP, but NOT to
write big, powerfull apps....
> Sorry about the outburst, but I was provoked 8-)
No problem, there will never be one "right" opinion about it and thats good!
But we should all be able to discuss about it and present our pros/cons.
Imagine there would ONLY be either assembler or java; wouldn't it be damn
boring???
> > I never hear this, "Windows for Teletubbies", but it's nice;-) What you
> > said about the audience:
>
> It's a very popular televison program for pre-school children in the UK
> broadcast by the BBC. Sort of Televison for Windows users.
I knew teletubbies, but not the expression "Windows for Teletubbies"...
> Nick/
Franz
- --
Wenn auch die Sicherheit vor den Menschen bis zu einem gewissen Grade
eintritt durch eine bestimmte Macht, Störungen zu beseitigen, und
durch Reichtum, so entspringt doch die reinste Sicherheit aus der Ruhe
und dem Rückzug aus der Masse. (Epikur)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE79Q2ieSeJPuOA2l4RArPwAJwJ1G+cdwkC0edp7w2Mt1xHYPJWIwCdG8/k
0qQVk8ns3XKEdzIyNY81lQ8=
=XAGh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: