Re: Compiling KDE 2.2 on potato ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I fully respect the decision of Ivan to not backport KDE 2.2 to
potato, although I still use potato with KDE 2.1.2.
>
> I am running potato 2.2 with Kernel 2.4.8, XFree 4.1 and some
> Ximian packages on my laptop and it's very, very stable.
> Now I compiled KDE 2.2 and You guess it: it's stable.
> (ok, a little problem with kpilotDaemon)
I think packaging is far more complicate as compiling ourself. In
many cases for me (who has no deep insight inside packaging) it is
the way to go, although it's not very elegant.
If you don't think so please pack up KDE-2.2 and provide it.
Other question: if I insist on a most stable environment what am I
missing if I still use KDE 2.1.2, except the good feeling to help
improving KDE with bugreports? My impression of the last weeks's
discussions is that (at the moment) KDE 2.2 ist not es stable as KDE
2.1.2. Same thing with KDE 2.0. It was not verry stable and got much
better with later versions. So I hope maybe a bugfixed version of
KDE-2.2 will make it into woody.
Ivan wrote:
> I for the life of me will never use testing. I will either use
> stable or unstable.
I have to remember that, thanks.
Hendrik
- - --
PGP ID 21F0AC0265C92061
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7jij5IfCsAmXJIGERAmwNAJ40TcoinB6MdF0ajIfI2tzWdSauUQCdEJd/
BdbG/fkAjQwZORRrT31KvPc=
=Wnie
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7jpRLIfCsAmXJIGERAgPHAJ9OO02sFNi9hxHSpOX5yOI3/7vczgCaAqke
OpKlArmBAmtDdlBWi0hOGNU=
=Ndp/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: