KDE2.2 - was version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: KDE2.2 - was version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
From: Gordon Sadler <gbsadler1@lcisp.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:51:42 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010410215141.A1394@lcisp.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010410202433.A11269@tdyc.com>; from rkrusty@tdyc.com on Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:24:33PM -0600
References: <20010410195325.A358@lcisp.com> <20010410200745.A411@lcisp.com> <[🔎] 20010410192953.A4687@tdyc.com> <[🔎] 01041019123900.00548@cr729927-a> <[🔎] 20010410201817.A16160@tdyc.com> <[🔎] 20010410202433.A11269@tdyc.com>

Ivan just a small notice.

In CVS (HEAD) kdelibs/debian/control, I believe you should add flex to
Build-Depends.

In CVS (HEAD) kdebase/debian/control, I believe you should add
binutils-dev to Build-Depends. Unless .. one of the changes was using
ansidecl.h from binutils-dev, but I think I saw a commit that may have
removed it. I can't seem to find the file now, this may be not needed.
Also kdebase, or wherever you put the new kioslave/help
stuff should depend on python(-base?).


Gordon Sadler

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: KDE2.2 - was version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
  - From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@tdyc.com>

References:
- Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
  - From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@tdyc.com>
- Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
  - From: Doug Byfield <dougbyf@home.com>
- Re: version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
  - From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@tdyc.com>
- Re: version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
  - From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@tdyc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
Next by Date: Re: KDE2.2 - was version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
Previous by thread: Re: version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
Next by thread: Re: KDE2.2 - was version of QT - was OpenSSL 0.9.6a breaks X?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread