Re: Unstable stable ?
Le Lundi 12 Mars 2001 09:37, Ivan E. Moore II a écrit :
> > Ivan, you said several times that the "unstable" debs are more stable
> > that the potato ones, and that unstable was better than testing... I'm
> > confused. Are you sure ? What is better in unstable ?
>
> heh...what I said is that if your running "woody/testing" then you should
> run the KDE/QT debs that are a part of "sid/unstable"...as they are closer
> matched to what your currently running..ie, built on the same libc and
> xlibs versions.
Oh, OK. That sounds more logical ;-) By the way at home I completely
reinstalled my system and remained in pure potato (I used testing before).
With the same KDE 2.1 packages, it is much faster than before !
--
Thibaut Cousin
email : cousin@in2p3.fr
web : http://clrwww.in2p3.fr
Reply to: