[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Where's my KDE Desktop



My problem is the same and all version of debian/kde/xfree too!
so what is the solution ?

Le Lundi 26 Février 2001 05:13, Ivan E. Moore II a écrit :
> No...his problem is the other problem that has been discussed here...
>
> Note the "I've got Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 / KDE 2.0.1 / XFREE 3.3.6"...he's
> not running unstable/sid...he's running the 2.0.1 version of KDE on potato
> and he updated his qt package.
>
> Ivan
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 11:59:37AM +1100, David Kempe wrote:
> > I just had this problem and fixed it.
> > Your version of kdebase is probably old.
> > You need to upgrade it. and apt-get distupgrade did it for me.
> > However the same command broke my lilo.
> > So make sure you rerun lilo and check your lilo.conf so you can get back
> > into you system.
> >
> > dave
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: BrainJam [mailto:brainjam@snipe.ch]
> > > Sent: Monday, 26 February 2001 8:50 AM
> > > To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
> > > Subject: Where's my KDE Desktop
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I cant see my KDE Desktop anymore (Icons and so on). The panel works
> > > without problems. When I try to start "kdesktop" in the Konsole,
> > > I get this
> > > error message:
> > >
> > > kdesktop: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/kdesktop.so:
> > > undefined symbol: noxim
> > >
> > > What should I do? kdebase is installed and kdesktop.so exists.
> > > I've got Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 / KDE 2.0.1 / XFREE 3.3.6
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
> ---end quoted text---

-- 
Ingénieur Système d'Information - Diffusion Multimédia
Cable & Wireless isdnet - http://www.isdnet.net



Reply to: