Re: Which libjdom is relevant?

To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Which libjdom is relevant?
From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:26:46 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] gctq2n$2b8$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] c9c316090810120420s32be9678k5f22d8cf5c676d5a@mail.gmail.com>

Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Debian currently contains three libjdom packages, libjdom-java,
> libjdom0-java, libjdom1-java.

This is a disaster! I wasn't even aware of the existence of libjdom-java.
Please, can the maintainers of reverse dependencies migrate to
libjdom1-java in time for lenny?

The only rdepends of libjdom-java I can find is statcvs (uploaders Vincent
Fourmond, Christian Bayle).

See bug #500539 for libjdom0-java.

Please use libjdom1-java for all new packages.

Cheers,

Marcus

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which libjdom is relevant?
  - From: "Onkar Shinde" <onkarshinde@gmail.com>

References:
- Which libjdom is relevant?
  - From: "Onkar Shinde" <onkarshinde@ubuntu.com>

Prev by Date: ITP: Cruisecontrol
Next by Date: Please unblock statcvs 1:0.4.0.dfsg-3
Previous by thread: Which libjdom is relevant?
Next by thread: Re: Which libjdom is relevant?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread