Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
"Michael K. Edwards" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> If it causes even one person to understand that the generation or
>> transportation of a copy is what matters, and not technical
>> workarounds, I'll consider it useful.
> If it causes even one person to examine the legal precedents and form
> his or her own judgement about whether the GPL means what it is often
> said to mean, I'll consider it useful.
I keep wondering, if the GPL is really supposed to mean all these
things which keep being claimed, why didn't the FSF write *that*,
instead of something entirely different?