On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:45:14PM +0200, Anders Breindahl wrote: > And by the way; that's the exact description of the possibility of > spamming: Highly probable, when off a dynamically assigned IP. It's > still not exact, and should therefore not be treated as a binary > criterion. (Think 3+ points in spamassassin). The people behind Kerio (which uses spamassassin) reckon even that is too generous for SORBS: http://forums.kerio.com/index.php?t=msg&goto=36262& -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature