[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Downgrading to Apache 1.3



On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:18:48 +0000, W.D.McKinney wrote in message 
<[🔎] W6467313289132971129864728@burger.akwireless.net>:
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> > From: R. W. Rodolico [mailto:stargazer@rodolico.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 06:00 PM
> > To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Downgrading to Apache 1.3
> >
> > I may need to downgrade to Apache 1.3 to fully utilize a package I
> > want to use that does not support the way Debian has Apache2 set up
> > (virtualmin/webmin). I can use the package, but will just not be
> > able to delegate creation of new sites to someone else without doing
> > some training.
> >
> > Any arguments for/against. I don't see that I lose a lot by going
> > backwards here, but I may just be missing the point completely.
> >
> > Rod
> >
> >
> 
> We run Apache 1.3 instead of Apache2 for those reasons also.

..if you guys pay people salaries to admin viable commercial web
hosting, you can also afford to invest in getting virtualmin/webmin
updated for Apache2.  ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



Reply to: