Re: [Fwd: Re: Spamassasin over RBL, was Re: rblsmtpd -t?]
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Of course. As said, if the list causes only people with *dynamic* IPs to
> > be forced to use their ISP's MTA, I'd agree that it's a very good idea.
>
> Very good idea... but how is the RBL going to stay so up-to-date with what
> is static, what is dynamic, etc.? It sounds good, but would be a logistic
> and administrative nightmare to keep it all current. Or has this been
> automated (or some other way)?
See http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul/adding.htm.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | e-advies@evbergen.xs4all.nl
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: