Re: caveat: GNOME 2.6 severly broken on Debian/unstable?
>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:48:40 +1000, Ian Wienand <ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> said:
Ian> Basically the two things that were added were
Ian> LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs
Ian> LDFLAGS += -Wl,-O1
Ian> Which raises the question are these flags sufficiently tested
Ian> by the binutils test suite?
I don't even know what these are supposed to do. HJ seems to be
out-of-town until later this month, so it may be some time before he
can chime in.
In the meantime: it appears that the bad libpango has hit "testing"?
That seems very unfortunate. The only good news is that upgrading
to libpango from "unstable" got my Debian/testing system to work again.
In any case, thanks for all the good work, Ian!
--david
Reply to: