Re: Downgrade of bacula template or error in SMITH process?
Helge Kreutzmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Hello Christian,
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:00:24AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Quoting Matthias Julius (email@example.com):
>> Yes, I considered and pondered that when the Smith process was
>> established. I could even put a Reply-To header in the call for
> Please make this as low impact on translation teams as possible and
> put the information into some easy accessible place, because some
> people have more complex setups and run scripts to automate lots of
> things. Firing up mutt and search for the right e-mail with manual
> attaching etc. might not always be the most convenient, or put
> bluntly: It would be nice if you could present the new scheme (and
> text templates) for discussion before you restart. Thanks.
You can easily use reportbug to attach a message to an existing bug.
This only gets tedious for packages with a lot of bugs.
It would be good if reportbug had a way to filter for i18n bugs.