Quoting Damyan Ivanov (firstname.lastname@example.org): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -=| Christian Perrier, 22.03.2007 19:30 |=- > > I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this > > package. > > Nothing can escape your eyes, Christian! > > > I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates > > review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf > > I will, when I consider the templates stable enough :) May I suggest that templates that are not stable enough are unmarked for translations? Otherwise, it's pretty likely that some translators and|or teams *will* work on them anyway, whicch would be the waste of time you describe. Indeed, I fail to see why stabilizing templates should take such a long time or even take time at all. Either you think that users have to be prompted through debconf and then you write templates and you try to write them carefully from the beginning.....or you don't think so and then you don't use debconf templates...:-) Anyway, we certainly can't interfere with your development model. I have sent a HOLD message to debian-l10n-english.
Description: Digital signature