Hi Christian, On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 18:04 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Another low priority NMU is on its way to complete the current debconf > localisation (as the former package provided an outdated POT file, > translations are indeed outdated) as well as rewrite the debconf > templates to make them consistent with the now generalised writing > style. I was wondering whether it is a good idea to do this so shortly before release. I surely agree with improving the style, but doing so now obsoletes or fuzzies many of the existing translations, with just a short time to update them, which means that the program will be less translated in Etch than it is now. Is it a good idea to improve some style details if this is at the cost of less translations? Isn't it better to do this right /after/ Etch? I've been explicitly holding off of making tweaks to templates right before a release. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part