Lucas Wall <lwall@debian.org> (20/09/2006): > Christian, Thomas and anybody wishing to help out with this: > > I finished reshaping the scripts and made a test run at my home in > gluck. You can see the page at the same location of the podebconf > campaign[1]. Just a little thing: Are the "NMU Bug" and "WNPP" columns needed? For WNPP bugs (and ftp.debian.org bugs), the maintainer is changed to "Orphaned" (or "Pending for removal") if a "O" (or "RM") bug is detected. Or would you prefer an other field in the status.nmu database? > The daily update cron is not running, but the mail interface should > work. Feel free to test the scripts. When we are all comfortable with > them I will reset and redownload all data. > > Some texts need updating, specially the NMU recommendations page > (process, mail template, etc). Help would be apreciated with that. > > I did not code the ability to override the bug list of packages. Should > I add it? or should we just handle false-positive/negatives by fixing > bug titles? I think retitling the bugs and adding the correct tags is better. Thanks a lot for your work. -- Thomas Huriaux
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature