Quoting Marco d'Itri (md@Linux.IT): > On Sep 16, Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> wrote: > > > With Lucas Wall agreement, here is a mail I initially sent him > > privately about the NMU campaign. I'll also repost other parts of this > > initial thread as I got the agreement of the involved people. > I object to l10n-relatd NMUs of my packages. > The missing catalogs will be added to all packages in time for the > freeze (or with the next upload). The NMU campaign takes care of that interaction. In early 2005, we established a practice described in http://people.debian.org/~lwall/i18n/nmu/ This practice is very careful about the NMUer/maintainer interaction. see the proposed mail templates which have been rewritten after....I had an incident with a maintainer who had about the same reaction than you..:-) So, indeed, in case someone in the NMU team forgets that Md packages are taboo and send you a NMU intent mail, please take care to mention him/her that you don't feel that need. Your will will be respected. Actually, I don't completely agree with the policy of letting translations rot in the BTS, which is a bad signal sent to translators, imho. However, I didn't checked if that's really the case for *your* packages, Marco....:)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature