Re: translations needed (cpufreqd debconf POs additions)
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:01:16AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Please have a look at podebconf-report-po(1), you will surely find it
> > useful ;)
> Actually, I was about recommedning Mattia to do so but I think that
> -i18n notices are also interesting to get *new* translations in.
> I even wonder whether I should make a wishlist BR to po-debconf so
> that podebconf-report-po can optionnally send a call for new
> translations to a given address (in that case, it would attach the POT
> file, of course).
My first reaction is to tell that translators do already have access
to POT files by visiting
But if translators send translations to unresponsive maintainers, their
translation can be ignored for months, which is quite discouraging.
On the other hand, when a developer send a call for translations,
translators do know that their translations will be incorporated in a
Maybe a good compromise would be to have a list of responsive maintainers,
something similar to http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu