(forw) Re: Packages not using po-debconf - more active actions to come
Larry (Wall), we need to find a way to record such information in your
"transition to po-debconf" status page so that no-one thinks about
working on the transition for a given package when the maintainer
gives good reasons for it not using po-debconf.
----- Forwarded message from Brian Sutherland <firstname.lastname@example.org> -----
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:41:05 +0100
From: Brian Sutherland <email@example.com>
To: Christian Perrier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Packages not using po-debconf - more active actions to come
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 06:54:42PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please take this package off your list, an NMU would be quite pointless
as the package is extremely out of date (The last few releases were
packaged with schooltool).
Since upstream changed their minds about the directions of schooltool
and schoolbell, I will not be removing schooltool but will upload a new
schoolbell package within a month.
ref -> bug# 286859
It's 10 minutes, 5 if you walk fast.
----- End forwarded message -----