Re: Package building on xen- or kvm-based buildds?
Svante Signell, le Fri 02 Dec 2011 00:23:53 +0100, a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:42 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Thu 01 Dec 2011 18:04:48 +0100, a écrit :
> > A lot of things can happen, e.g. translator escaping from the chroot.
> How can a translator escape from a chroot.
Because when they get started because a process opens their node, they
don't know that that process is in a chroot.
> I thought translators were safe beasts :-(
Depends on what safety you want.
> > > > > rootskel (Samuel T. , which patch is needed?).
> > > >
> > > > The one which is on debian-ports, simply.
> > >
> > > Do I have to download the source from debian-ports the see which patch
> > > is needed, or is apt-get source enough?
> > That's equivalent.
> No they are not. If I apt-get source rootskel I do get the Debian
> archive version, not the one from debian-ports.
You are missing the deb-src entry for debian-ports in your sources.list
That being said, since it's only udebs, I apparently only uploaded on
> > > Has a bug report been submitted?
> > No, because the changes aren't finalized.
> What is left to decide on??
See the changelog:
* use a for loop around template loading. For some mysterious reason it hangs
= src/lib/debian-installer/exit-hurd: pass -f to busybox to make it simply
call reboot(), which DTRT.
* add a basic umount command.
= Do not require TERM_FRAMEBUFFER to be set for g-i on !linux-any.
= Require TERM to be set to hurd for g-i on hurd-any.
= Harmonize S40term-hurd with linux & kfreebsd, fixes glitch with
Some of these are already commited to the official debian package (I've
marked them '='), others aren't because they are just hacks.