Hello! On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 08:50:58PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Philip Charles, le Mon 12 Oct 2009 23:52:32 +1300, a écrit : > > > 1. Does entropy still have to be copied to /dev/urandom ? > > > > Or use the random-egd package. Has this been in productive use for some time, and is it considered (in some bounds) stable? Or may it, for the time being, be rather advisable to stick with simply copying a binary to /dev/random and /dev/urandom? > > > 2. Configuring the network > > > ten days ago "settrans -fgap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 > > > \ -a 192.168.1.10 -g 192.168.1.4 -m 255.255.255.0 -4" > > > worked nicely, now it is broken. "pfinet --usage" says that it > > > should be "-4 NAME" What is NAME? Or am I off track? > > > I will also have to look at /etc/network/interfaces > > > > I simply do not use the -4 option and it works. I guess NAME should be > > /servers/socket/2 and if you wanted to enable ipv6 at the same time, > > add -6 /servers/socket/26 > > I suspect that this is broken. A show stopper. Just strip away the -4 you had at the end. That's not needed (it's even wrong), and without that one pfinet should work as it has done for the last few years. These new options are only needed for IPv6 support. Regards, Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature