Re: Debian Hurd package
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:02:02PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> As in the current situation, the Debian Hurd package has been in
> abandoned state for too long. There's been no CVS update for almost a
> year, it has a critical bug (#190732) which is fixed upstream and
> dates 168 days old, and a serious FTBFS bug (#156600) which dates more
> than a year ago, had a trivial fix from day one and is now fixed
> upstream either.
The sucky state of glibc has been far more problematic. Alfred finally
convinced upstream to apply his glibc patches so that it compiles for
the Hurd again. Last night I sent two patches in for gcc to get it
doing the right thing for us, and I hope in the next few days to have
I have no objections to you being part of the maintainer team for the
Debian Hurd port/package, etc., but I think that getting a fixed glibc
in first is more important than the Hurd package itself.