Re: pam patch
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 04:39:06PM +0200, PUYDT Julien wrote:
> I think ideally, grep -r . -e PATH_MAX should only show the
> changelog entry telling your patch made it disappear.
It depends what upstream will accept. I've done hacks like this a
couple times so that upstream would take the code and maintain it.
I figure once we have a decent user base, people will revisit alot of
these programs since they'll want to add Hurd-specific features
anyway.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
- Wolfgang Jaehrling
Reply to:
- References:
- pam patch
- From: Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek <hramrach_l@centrum.cz>
- Re: pam patch
- From: PUYDT Julien <julien.puydt@club-internet.fr>