Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 12:42:03AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:45:22 -0400
> From: Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I've Cc'd alpha list to ask about the package name currently involved
> (libc6.1) will that need to change to 6.2? What about libc0.2 for hurd?
> Keep it libc0.2 for the Hurd. There will be a dependency issue
> though. People will need a recent enough version of the hurd
> package for glibc 2.2. AFAIK there isn't a Debian package yet that is
> recent enough. It's probably best to coordinate this with Marcus
I just uploaded one, and it will be installed tomorrow (until then, check
http://incoming.debian.org). It will be sufficient to
Depend: hurd (>= 20000803)
Conflict: hurd (<= 20000726)
I just don't know what is better in the long run.
> Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied
> for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate
> libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd.
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de, email@example.com PGP Key ID 36E7CD09