Re: Bug#151886: status of report #151886? / feedback
Camm Maguire writes:
> Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > [keeping all the people in the CC]
> > Scanning the reports, I see Matthew Wilcox beeing asked about:
> > > > In either case, I will need a knowledgeable hppa person to advise,
> > > > discuss and help generate patches for this to get fixed any time soon.
> > > > Gcl can build its own bfd library, so patches here can be simply
> > > > incorporated.
> > >
> > > willy would be a good target. I'm going to be out of town for a couple
> > > of weeks, but (if it's still pending) I'd be happy to help when I get
> > > back.
> > Camm, another try with the current (20021227) gcc-snapshot package
> > (now branched to become gcc-3.3 sometime).
> I forget which of the several gcc difficulties I'd been having with
> GCL on hppa to which this note referred.
yes, the report got long ...
> In any case, I see I'm going to have a problem with 3.3:
> /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:4:2: #error "GCC no longer implements <varargs.h>."
> /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:5:2: #error "Revise your code to use <stdarg.h>."
> Fixing this will take considerable effort. Is there a work around to
> get varargs under 3.3?
I don't think so:
2002-07-15 Zack Weinberg <email@example.com>
* ginclude/varargs.h: Replace with stub which issues #error.
* ginclude/stdarg.h: __builtin_stdarg_start is renamed
* doc/invoke.texi, doc/sourcebuild.texi, doc/tm.texi,
doc/trouble.texi: Remove references to GCC-provided <varargs.h>.