Re: Bug#639015: libffi soname change upcoming
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:30:42PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> OCAML might be in a similar situation, but it seems that they don’t use
> libffi. Their packages do, however, all seem to have a dependency on
> libc6 which corresponds to our situation. Only that a so-name bump of
> libc is probably less frequent than one in libffi...
That's probably because they're shipping dynamic binaries instead of static