Re: haskore update
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 16:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 09:23 -0430 schrieb Ernesto
> > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, den 27.05.2011, 23:56 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > > > you have been quite here lately. haskore, a package that you touched
> > > > last, is one of the last remaining bits in the transition. Upstream has
> > > > a new version, 0.2.0.1 instead of 0.1.0.4 – do you want to look into
> > > > that, e.g. whether we want the new version and packaging it so that it
> > > > works with the changes package names?
> > >
> > > I meant quiet, not quite, of course. But my question still stands: Do
> > > you want to look into upgrading haskore? We are especially interested in
> > > 0.2.0.2 as it allows building against parsec-3.
> > The latest Haskore depends on event-list (>= 0.1), in turn depending on
> > non-negative (>= 0.1). I just pushed the changes for non-negative, that
> > build cleanly in my Sid cowbuilder and lintian is not complaining.
> > Please review and upload.
> Just to reduce the number of roundtrips: Can you prepare all three
> packages, so that I (or someone) can review and upload in one run?
My Sid box is *hardware* broken and I don't have a spare, so I build
packages using cowbuilder on my Squeeze box. How can I get cowbuilder to
use local packages to feed the fresh ones in?
Ernesto Hernández-Novich - @iamemhn - Unix: Live free or die!
Geek by nature, Linux by choice, Debian of course.
If you can't aptitude it, it isn't useful or doesn't exist.
GPG Key Fingerprint = 438C 49A2 A8C7 E7D7 1500 C507 96D6 A3D6 2F4C 85E3