Hiya, On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:14:09PM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
Hi. Excerpts from Debian FTP Masters's message of Qui Mai 26 11:17:08 -0300 2011: (...)haskell98-report_20080907-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.orgDoes it still makes sense to keep this package in Debian? If we are planning to keep one haskell report, maybe it should be 2010. In this case, I propose we changed the package name to haskell-report, to avoid problems on the future.
Do we know what GHC is planning on doing? On  you can see the statement:
As with all known Haskell systems, GHC implements some extensions to the language. They are all enabled by options; by default GHC understands only plain Haskell 98. So if Haskell 98 is still relevant then we should keep it and package 2010 separately.
If not, then I agree we should do as you propose. Cheers, Iain http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.3/html/users_guide/ghc-language-features.html
Description: Digital signature