Re: haskell-mtlparse in the DHG
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:35:17PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> If you follow this argumentation, we could put the dependencies under
> the DHG hood and you keep the ledger package.
That's fine by me.
> Well, what about the option that you join the haskell group and ensure
> from within the group that the haskell libraries you need are in
> shape? :-) (We always need manpower, especially people with upload
> rights are very useful when it comes to transitions like the ghc7 one)
I don't anticipate having much time for that, and I don't think I
know what I'm doing, but feel free to add me anyway.