Joachim Breitner ha scritto: > Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 13:46 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: >> I noticed that hstringtemplate includes a doc-base file for the HTML haddock >> documentation. Should we do this in all packages and include it in the >> PackageTemplate? > > I’m not sure. I, as a user, never used doc-base. Also, the haddock > libraries are linked in a probably more useful way from > file:///usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/index.html > Maybe only that should have a doc-base entry, and single modules should > not? > > IIRC some few libraries have real, non-API documentation. These can of > course have a doc-base entry of their own. > > > But if we chose to add doc-base files to all libraries, we should, if > possible, do it via haskell-devscripts. > > > Is anyone here using the doc-base indexes and can comment on the > usefulness of this? I don't use it either, but I added it to all my haskell packages because I thought it could be useful for other users. Anyway, I have no particular objection about removing it. Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature